Bobby Jindal - DANGEROUS!!!
This is from my favorite atheist site ... Friendly Atheist ... written by Hemant Mehta ... John McBush is meeting with this clown this weekend as a possible VP choice:
QUOTE
Word on the street is that John McCain is meeting with potential running mates this coming weekend.
Among them: Mitt Romney… Governor Charlie Crist of Florida… and Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana.
I’m worried.
Not because I think McCain will have a strong enough ticket to beat Barack Obama. But because of that third option.
Of all the names being mentioned as McCain’s potential running mate, Piyush “Bobby” Jindal, the 36-year-old first-term governor of Louisiana, is not only the youngest and least experienced, but also the only one who is not white. Yet in a year in which Democratic voters have raised few objections to such traditional “obstacles,” Jindal may be especially attractive as Republicans seek a way to offset the “post-racial” and youthful appeal of Senator Barack Obama.
Jindal, who was born in Baton Rouge to a family that had just arrived there from the Punjab area of India, took office in January after serving three years in the House of Representatives. In a race with four candidates, Jindal, who was born a Hindu but converted to Roman Catholicism as a teenager, won 54 percent of the vote after campaigning as a social conservative…
Jindal is young. He’s relatively popular among Republicans. And he’s brown.
The New York Times‘ William Kristol also thinks Jindal would be a solid Vice-Presidential pick.
I hope that doesn’t happen. For purely selfish reasons.
Do you have any idea how annoying it would be to deal with 293,847,293 Indian family members and friends talking about how wonderful it is that a desi has a legitimate shot of going to the White House? You can bet that many Indians will overlook his positions and just look at his skin color.
As one Indian website writes:
To see Jindal just a heartbeat away from the US Presidency should gladden our hearts. If he makes it, it will be a jewel in the crown for Indian Americans. His loyalty will be to his country of adoption, but it will be a dream come true for Indian Americans.
Not a dream. *So* not a dream. It’s not a dream to have another Republican in power who’s going to further ruin this country… and have it be the most famous Indian person in America.
While many Indians will be proud, I’d have to argue how he’s bad for our country every step of the way.
(The analogy isn’t quite the same, but I also wouldn’t want to be a black man telling other black people to vote against Barack Obama.)
Why am I not supporting Bobby Jindal as Vice-President?
He voted against expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.
He’s completely anti-abortion, even in cases of rape or incest, getting a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
He is completely opposed to gay rights, earning a 0% rating from the Human Rights Campaign.
Church-state separation? Forget it. Americans United for Separation of Church and State give him a 0% rating.
He thinks “intelligent design as an alternative to evolution may not be out of place in public schools,” so we know his support of real science would be minimal.
Rush Limbaugh called him the “next Ronald Reagan.”
He once wrote about a friend who was possessed by the devil… meaning he believes someone could actually be possessed by a devil.
A little more on his Intelligent Design position.
In a gubernatorial debate that took place on September 27th of last year, this is what went down:
Baton Rouge Advocate columnist Carl Redman: “What about intelligent design? And the issue really is, it’s not what’s on the books, but if this comes up again. Because this state has wrestled with creationism and spent a lot of time and resources. I was covering the legislature for a couple years when they wrestled with the abortion issue. It could come back at any time. What the governor does is very critical [in those fields?].”
Jindal [nodding]: “Sure, and let’s talk about intelligent design. I’m a biology major. That’s my degree. The reality is there are a lot of things that we don’t understand. There’s no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos. There’s no scientific theory that explains how you can create organic life out of inorganic matter. I think we owe it to our children to teach them the best possible modern scientific facts and theories. Teach them what different theories are out there for the things that aren’t answerable by science, that aren’t answered by science. Let them decide for themselves. I don’t think we should be scared to do that. Personally, it certainly makes sense to me that when you look at creation, you would believe in a creator. Let’s not be afraid to teach our kids the very best science.”
According to science advocate Barbara Forrest:
Jindal’s remarks, which clearly signal his support for teaching ID, are a study in incoherence. On one hand, this Rhodes scholar wants “the very best science” taught to children. On the other, his assertion that children should be told “what different theories are out there” in order to explain what science cannot is an admission that ID is not science. His inference of a creator from “looking at creation,” while legitimate as a personal religious belief, is at odds with his statement that “our kids” should be taught “the very best science.” Putting the two together in a public school science class violates not only the standards of responsible science teaching but the U.S. Constitution as well.
It’s easy to say I’m dismissing him for simply being a conservative Republican, but it’s more than that.
Despite his success in Louisiana politics, he’s an embarrassment to many Indian people. He doesn’t share the values so many of the rest of us do.
The culture I grew up in encouraged a strong education — especially in the sciences. He throws solid science out the window.
I was taught to respect all people and to stand up for their rights. As a minority, you hope others will do the same for you. Yet, he routinely advocates anti-gay, anti-woman policies in favor of socially conservative, irresponsible positions.
Of course, these values along with many others aren’t limited to just the Indian culture.
But how did it happen that the most prominent politician among us had to be the anomaly?
Technorati Tags: atheist, atheism, Indian-American
UNQUOTE
QUOTE
Word on the street is that John McCain is meeting with potential running mates this coming weekend.
Among them: Mitt Romney… Governor Charlie Crist of Florida… and Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana.
I’m worried.
Not because I think McCain will have a strong enough ticket to beat Barack Obama. But because of that third option.
Of all the names being mentioned as McCain’s potential running mate, Piyush “Bobby” Jindal, the 36-year-old first-term governor of Louisiana, is not only the youngest and least experienced, but also the only one who is not white. Yet in a year in which Democratic voters have raised few objections to such traditional “obstacles,” Jindal may be especially attractive as Republicans seek a way to offset the “post-racial” and youthful appeal of Senator Barack Obama.
Jindal, who was born in Baton Rouge to a family that had just arrived there from the Punjab area of India, took office in January after serving three years in the House of Representatives. In a race with four candidates, Jindal, who was born a Hindu but converted to Roman Catholicism as a teenager, won 54 percent of the vote after campaigning as a social conservative…
Jindal is young. He’s relatively popular among Republicans. And he’s brown.
The New York Times‘ William Kristol also thinks Jindal would be a solid Vice-Presidential pick.
I hope that doesn’t happen. For purely selfish reasons.
Do you have any idea how annoying it would be to deal with 293,847,293 Indian family members and friends talking about how wonderful it is that a desi has a legitimate shot of going to the White House? You can bet that many Indians will overlook his positions and just look at his skin color.
As one Indian website writes:
To see Jindal just a heartbeat away from the US Presidency should gladden our hearts. If he makes it, it will be a jewel in the crown for Indian Americans. His loyalty will be to his country of adoption, but it will be a dream come true for Indian Americans.
Not a dream. *So* not a dream. It’s not a dream to have another Republican in power who’s going to further ruin this country… and have it be the most famous Indian person in America.
While many Indians will be proud, I’d have to argue how he’s bad for our country every step of the way.
(The analogy isn’t quite the same, but I also wouldn’t want to be a black man telling other black people to vote against Barack Obama.)
Why am I not supporting Bobby Jindal as Vice-President?
He voted against expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.
He’s completely anti-abortion, even in cases of rape or incest, getting a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
He is completely opposed to gay rights, earning a 0% rating from the Human Rights Campaign.
Church-state separation? Forget it. Americans United for Separation of Church and State give him a 0% rating.
He thinks “intelligent design as an alternative to evolution may not be out of place in public schools,” so we know his support of real science would be minimal.
Rush Limbaugh called him the “next Ronald Reagan.”
He once wrote about a friend who was possessed by the devil… meaning he believes someone could actually be possessed by a devil.
A little more on his Intelligent Design position.
In a gubernatorial debate that took place on September 27th of last year, this is what went down:
Baton Rouge Advocate columnist Carl Redman: “What about intelligent design? And the issue really is, it’s not what’s on the books, but if this comes up again. Because this state has wrestled with creationism and spent a lot of time and resources. I was covering the legislature for a couple years when they wrestled with the abortion issue. It could come back at any time. What the governor does is very critical [in those fields?].”
Jindal [nodding]: “Sure, and let’s talk about intelligent design. I’m a biology major. That’s my degree. The reality is there are a lot of things that we don’t understand. There’s no theory in science that could explain how, contrary to the laws of entropy, you could create order out of chaos. There’s no scientific theory that explains how you can create organic life out of inorganic matter. I think we owe it to our children to teach them the best possible modern scientific facts and theories. Teach them what different theories are out there for the things that aren’t answerable by science, that aren’t answered by science. Let them decide for themselves. I don’t think we should be scared to do that. Personally, it certainly makes sense to me that when you look at creation, you would believe in a creator. Let’s not be afraid to teach our kids the very best science.”
According to science advocate Barbara Forrest:
Jindal’s remarks, which clearly signal his support for teaching ID, are a study in incoherence. On one hand, this Rhodes scholar wants “the very best science” taught to children. On the other, his assertion that children should be told “what different theories are out there” in order to explain what science cannot is an admission that ID is not science. His inference of a creator from “looking at creation,” while legitimate as a personal religious belief, is at odds with his statement that “our kids” should be taught “the very best science.” Putting the two together in a public school science class violates not only the standards of responsible science teaching but the U.S. Constitution as well.
It’s easy to say I’m dismissing him for simply being a conservative Republican, but it’s more than that.
Despite his success in Louisiana politics, he’s an embarrassment to many Indian people. He doesn’t share the values so many of the rest of us do.
The culture I grew up in encouraged a strong education — especially in the sciences. He throws solid science out the window.
I was taught to respect all people and to stand up for their rights. As a minority, you hope others will do the same for you. Yet, he routinely advocates anti-gay, anti-woman policies in favor of socially conservative, irresponsible positions.
Of course, these values along with many others aren’t limited to just the Indian culture.
But how did it happen that the most prominent politician among us had to be the anomaly?
Technorati Tags: atheist, atheism, Indian-American
UNQUOTE
posted by MattFeath at 2:58 PM
1 Comments:
Hello there. I am from louisiana. I am very critical of bad politics. Governor Jindal is absolutely the best governor we have ever had here. Surely from California, you cannot see this. Roads that have not been worked on in over 20 years are being fixed. Schools are getting upgrades and improvements for equal education. Hospitals are slowly coming back to life. He may be young and inexperienced, but he knows what he is doing. Where did your family come from? Surely you are not from a nomadic native American tribe. Are you? Just like Jindal, you came fresh off a boat without papers. How can you speak for minorities when you put down Indian Americans. (I am Italian American), and although I respect your beliefs on how we humans came to be. I believe in creation. For a big bang to occur, there must be fuel. (its solid, proven science) Where did the fuel come from? Who made it? Lets see you explain how to make something out of nothing..not a room with bacteria filled air...something out of nothing..go to space and sit on the moon until you see another planet appear from absolutely nothing. As far as religion goes, think of it like this, What do you have to lose by believing? But if your theories are wrong and you didnt believe, where does that put you? Great post, I just dont agree with very much of it at all.
Post a Comment
<< Home